This
guide is intended to describe the process of aligning a single crystal
in SPICE. As the transformation from angles to reciprocal space is
accomplished using a UB matrix formalism, this process is slightly
different than that typically used on a triple-axis.
The simplest way to explain this process is with an example of a
typical sample alignment. We will assume a single crystal of YBCO
is mounted in the (h 0 l) scattering plane.
The approximate alignment of the sample can be specified when the begin
command is issued to start a new experiment. An example for the
case of YBCO in the (h 0 l) plane is shown in the figure below.
The (h,k,l) indices of the 2 reflections which define the scattering
plane vectors and the sample lattice constants must be given if the
Specify Scattering Plane option if selected. It is important to
note that in this case, the first vector given is assumed to be along
the lower arc. For instance, if the sample was mounted such that
the (0,0,l) direction was along the lower arc, the two reflections shown
above should be swapped.
We will now make the assumption that the instrument has been aligned
(see How to Align a triple-axis spectrometer).
The following steps are needed to align the sample and input the
alignement information into SPICE.
1. Ensure
the monochromator and analyzer are in the elastic position: drive e 0
2. Check
the starting configuration of the UB Matrix. To do this, select
the UB Matrix tab from the Sample
top-level tab. If the begin box was filled in as shown above, the UB
Matrix tab should have the mode set to Define
scattering plane vectors and 1 reflection, the lattice
constants and scattering plane vectors set as shown above and a single
reflection set so that the first specified peak is along the lower arc.
3.
Drive to a known reflection along the 1st specified direction (for
instance drive to the (2,0,0) reflection for the case shown above): drive h 2 k 0 l 0 e 0
the alias br will drive to a bragg position so the same command could
be given as: br 2 0 0
4. Close
the beam shutter and mount the sample such that the first specified
vector is along the bisecting lower arc. For the case shown above
this corresponds to mounting the sample with the (1,0,0) direction
along the lower arc.
5.
Scan angles s1, s2, and sgl
to optimize the intensity of a known reflection along the (1,0,0)
direction - say the (2,0,0) peak in the example above. For the
purposes of this example, we will assume the maximum was found at: s2=-78.794 s1=-40.682 sgl=-2.5
See the NOTE at the bottom of this
guide regarding what happens if the specified direction is not
sufficiently close to the lower arc.
6.
We will now assume that the spectrometer is at the positions specified
above. We will now enter the measured peak position in the UB
Matrix tab - enter h=2, k=0, l=0 and press the green Add button.
This should result in the following UB
Matrix tab:
To calculate the UB matrix using the specified peak positions, click on
the blue Calculate UB Matrix Update Orientation
Information button. This will result in a popup box
that contains information about the UB matrix calculation. Within
this window you can see the peak information as it was given on the UB
Matrix tab, the calculated angle position for the specified h,k,l (this
is where a drive h k l will send the motors) and the calculated h,k,l
from the motors as specified.
We can see that the calculated h,k,l are not quite at (2,0,0) - this is
because the a lattice constant given is not exactly consistent with the
measured peak position. At this point you can either accept the
orientation by clicking on the blue Accept
Configuration button or cancel and tweak the orientation.
In this example, we will choose the later and click the blue Cancel
button.
There are a number of utilities present to do some simple angle
calculations (and also the command-line calc command). One of
these allows you to calculate the d-spacing from the measured s2 angle.
This is shown in the following image:
from the above calculation, we can see that the measured d-spacing is
1.93216 which gives an a lattice constant of 2*1.93216=3.86432.
We can put this value into the UB matrix tab for the a lattice
constant and click on the blue Calculate UB Matrix Update Orientation
Information button. This will now result in the
following pop-up box:
We can now see that the input lattice constant is more consistent with
the measured s2 angle so we accept the orientation by clicking on the
blue Accept Configuration button.
7.
A valid orientation now exists but it only has information about
the (h 0 0)
direction. We need to check that the crystal is, in fact, in the (h 0 l)
scattering plane as was originally input. To do this, we need to
find another reflection in the scattering plane and re-calculate the UB
matrix with the information from both reflections.
As the other direction which defines the scattering plane is the (0 0 l) direction, we will look
for some peak along this direction (for the sake of this example, the (0 0 4)
reflection will be assumed. As with the (2 0 0) case
above, start by driving to the (0 0 4)
position:
As the (0 0 4)
direction should be (at least mostly) along the upper arc, we need to
scan s2, s1, and sgu
to properly align the (0 0 4) Bragg
reflection. Let's assume that this reflection was optimized at:
s2=-49.43 s1=-116.0 sgu=3.5
We now need to input this information into the UB matrix. To do
this, select the UB Matrix tab from the Sample
top-level tab. The calculation mode now needs to be changed from Define
scattering plane vectors and 1 reflection, to Define 2
non-colinear reflections. Assuming that the motors are now
positioned at the optimal positions for the (0 0 4) Bragg
reflection, we now add the reflection: first type in (0 0 4) for (h k l),
then select Reflection 2 from the blue
pull-down menu and finally add the reflection by hitting the green Add button.
The UB Matrix tab should now look
like the following:
We calculate the UB matrix, as before by clicking on the blue Calculate
UB Matrix Update Orientation Information button. The
resulting popup box should look like the following:
From the above image, you can see that the calculated lposition
for the (0 0 4)
reflection is not exactly at (0 0 4) again indicating a problem with the
lattice constant. As above, we can recalculate the c-axis lattice
constant which indicates that it should change from 11.68 Angstroms to
11.732 Angstroms. Putting this new value in and re-calculating
the UB matrix (the blue Calculate UB Matrix Update Orientation
Information button) results in the following:
We can see that both reflections are rather close to the correct values
and the deviation in the (0 0 4) peaks stems from the fact that the 2
reflections are not precisely separated by 90 degrees.
The sample is now completely aligned in the (h 0 l) scattering plane.
NOTE Regarding Arcs
In the 2 peak configuration, the calculated positions for the arcs may
not be the same as those input. The program calculates the set of
arc values needed to put BOTH
reflections in the scattering plane. This may correspond to a
completely different set than those initially input. This is
particularly true if the measured reflection is not very nearly along
an arc. If that is the case, you may find that the
calculated set of arc values will not be optimally aligned for either
reflection. The only way to solve this problem is to optimize BOTHsgu
and sglatBOTH reflections. If
these values are now input into the UB Matrix
calculation, a consistent and correct set of arc values should be
calculated.